On February 6, 2018, the Federal Government introduced proposed
amendments to the Fisheries Act with
Bill C-68 (the “Bill”). The Bill seeks to reverse several provisions of
the current Fisheries Act that was
amended in 2012 when the Harper government was in power. The Trudeau government
states they are reversing the cuts made by the previous government to restore
lost protections and incorporate new safeguards.
The Pre-2012
Fisheries Act
A significant feature of the pre-2012 Fisheries Act was that is protected fish habitat, including waters
capable of supporting fish. It was not
required to prove that fish actually occupied the waters and that those waters
contributed to fish habitat. If water
had the potential to be fish-bearing, then they were a protected fish habitat.
Under the pre-2012 Fisheries
Act, “fish habitat” was defined as “any spawning grounds and nursery,
rearing, food supply and migration areas on which fish depend directly or indirectly
in order to carry out their life processes,” and applied to all fish. Section 35 contained a broad prohibition on
any work, undertaking or activity that resulted in the harmful alteration or
disruption, or the destruction (“HADD”),
of fish habitat. This was generally
considered to be a powerful provision that protected fish bearing waters and those
bodies of waters that could be fish bearing, or attributed to fish habitat.
Current Fisheries Act (Post 2012)
Perhaps the most significant change made to the Fisheries Act in 2012 was to the
provisions relating to fish and fish habitat. Under the current Act, protection for fish
only applies in certain specified fisheries including commercial fisheries,
aboriginal fisheries, and designated recreational fisheries. Moreover, the current Act gives the Governor
in Council the power to make regulations providing for exemptions from the Act,
including, for example, excluding fisheries from the definitions of Aboriginal,
commercial, and recreational fisheries.
Bill
C-68, the Proposed Changes to the Fisheries
Act
The propose amendments to the current Act seek to restore previous measures protecting all fish and fish habitat, and, according to the Government, to introduce new modern safeguards in order to improve the protection of fisheries and their ecosystem. The proposed amendments are intended to achieve several objectives, some of which include:
-
restoring
lost protections by returning to comprehensive protection against harming
all fish and fish habitat;
- strengthening
the role of Indigenous peoples in project reviews, monitoring and policy
development;
- allowing
for the better management of large and small projects impacting fish and
fish habitat through a new permitting framework and codes of practice; and
- promoting
restoration of degraded habitat and rebuilding of depleted fish stocks.
While these are laudable objectives, the effectiveness of the proposed amendments is yet to be demonstrated.
i.
New
Definitions to Support Amendments
Under the Bill, many definitions are changed, repealed, or returned to their pre-2012 iteration. Notable changes include the following:
Under the Bill, many definitions are changed, repealed, or returned to their pre-2012 iteration. Notable changes include the following:
-
The
definition “fish habitat” is broadened to mean any water frequented by
fish, as opposed to only areas where fish depend directly or indirectly in
order to carry out their life processes.
- The
definition of “fishery” is replaced. It is now a broad definition including
all species and fish-bearing waters, not just a place where fishery
appliances are used.
- The definition “serious harm to fish” is
repealed as the broadened protections eliminate the severity of harm as a
criterion for the application of the Act’s protections.
ii. A Robust “Purpose” of the Fisheries Act
Another notable change is with respect to the purpose of the Act. The current and previous versions of the Act did not contain a purpose section. The Bill states that the purpose of the Act will be to provide a framework for the “proper management” of fisheries and “the conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat, including by preventing pollution.”
Under the Bill, the Governor in Council must consider many factors before making a recommendation that a regulation be made, including the contribution to the productivity of relevant fisheries by the fish or fish habitat, measures and standards to avoid fish death and avoid the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat, how the decision affects fish banks, the traditional knowledge of Indigenous peoples, and other important considerations.
Perhaps the most significant change is the restoration of the HADD provisions similar to those in the pre-2012 Fisheries Act. Under the Bill, it is prohibited to carry on any work, undertaking or activity that results in the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat. The current Act only protects fish in designated fisheries. Since the proposed definition of “fish habitat” is also broadened to include any water frequented by fish, or waters where fish depend directly or indirectly to carry out their life process, this amendment would protect all fish.
Other notable changes include the enhanced Ministerial powers to rebuild depleted fish stock and take “prompt measures” to address threats to the proper management and control of fisheries and the conservation and protection of fish, make a fisheries management order.
iv.
Consideration
of Indigenous Peoples of Canada
Under the Bill, when making a decision under the Act the Minister must consider the adverse effects that decision may have on the rights of Indigenous peoples of Canada. In addition, the Minister may consider traditional knowledge of the Indigenous peoples of Canada, community knowledge, “social” and “cultural factors” in the management of fisheries, and may cooperate with an Indigenous governing or other body (including a co-management body) established under a land claim agreement.
Under the Bill, when making a decision under the Act the Minister must consider the adverse effects that decision may have on the rights of Indigenous peoples of Canada. In addition, the Minister may consider traditional knowledge of the Indigenous peoples of Canada, community knowledge, “social” and “cultural factors” in the management of fisheries, and may cooperate with an Indigenous governing or other body (including a co-management body) established under a land claim agreement.
v.
Penalties
The Bill does not alter any of the penalty provisions in the current Act, which makes a distinction between individuals, corporations, and small revenue corporations for purposes of penalties and fines. With respect to corporations, the minimum fine for a first offence is $500,000 (by way of indictment) and the maximum is $6 million. For a corporation’s second offence, the fine is a minimum of $1 million to a maximum of $12 million (see section 40(1)(ii)). The amendments to the penalty provisions in 2012 were generally considered to be enhanced from the previous versions.
vi. Conclusion
Bill C-68, if enacted, will significantly change the protections in place under the current Act by broadening protection to all fish and fish habitat, providing Indigenous peoples of Canada an enhanced role in the process, and broadening the considerations for decision making and drafting regulations to consider other factors, such as traditional knowledge.
The Bill does not alter any of the penalty provisions in the current Act, which makes a distinction between individuals, corporations, and small revenue corporations for purposes of penalties and fines. With respect to corporations, the minimum fine for a first offence is $500,000 (by way of indictment) and the maximum is $6 million. For a corporation’s second offence, the fine is a minimum of $1 million to a maximum of $12 million (see section 40(1)(ii)). The amendments to the penalty provisions in 2012 were generally considered to be enhanced from the previous versions.
vi. Conclusion
Bill C-68, if enacted, will significantly change the protections in place under the current Act by broadening protection to all fish and fish habitat, providing Indigenous peoples of Canada an enhanced role in the process, and broadening the considerations for decision making and drafting regulations to consider other factors, such as traditional knowledge.
The proposed amendments will reverse many of the changes that were made
to the Act in 2012 and appear to support
habitat and other protections while maintaining the enhanced penalty
regime introduced in 2012. The
procedures for permitting under the Act, engagement of Indigenous peoples and
other practical implementation processes are not currently known.
For information on how Bill
C-68 may affect your operation please contact Sean Parker, Ainslie Fowler or
another member of our Energy, Environmental and Regulatory Practice Group.
A Table of Key Changes
Provision
|
Pre-2012 Fisheries Act
|
Current Fisheries Act
|
Bill C-68
|
“Fishery”
|
"fishery" includes the area,
locality, place or station in or on which a pound, seine, net, weir or other fishing
appliance is used, set, placed or located, and the area, tract or stretch of
water in or from which fish may be taken by the said pound, seine, net, weir
or other fishing appliance, and also the pound, seine, net, weir, or other
fishing appliance used in connection therewith;
|
No change.
|
Fishery with respect to any fish, includes,
(a) any of its species, populations,
assemblages and stocks, whether the fish is fished or not,
(b) any place where fishing may be carried
on,
(c) any period during which fishing may be
carried on,
(d) any method of fishing used, and
(e) any type of fishing gear or equipment
or fishing vessel used;
|
“Fish Habitat”
|
"fish habitat" means spawning
grounds and nursery, rearing, food supply and migration areas on which fish depend
directly or indirectly in order to carry out their life processes;
|
“fish habitat” means spawning grounds and
any other areas, including nursery, rearing, food supply and migration areas,
on which fish depend directly or indirectly in order to carry out their life
processes.
|
Fish habitat
means water frequented by fish and any other areas on which fish depend
directly or indirectly to carry out their life processes, including spawning
20 grounds and nursery, rearing, food supply and migration areas.
|
“Waters
Frequented by fish”
|
“water frequented by fish" means
Canadian fisheries waters
|
No change.
|
Subsumed by
definition of Fish habitat and Fishery
|
“Canadian
Fisheries Waters”
|
Canadian fisheries waters means all waters
in the fishing zones of Canada, all waters in the territorial sea of Canada
and all internal waters of Canada
|
No change.
|
Subsumed by
definition of Fish habitat and Fishery
|
Purpose
Section
|
Repealed
|
Repealed
|
Purpose of
Act
2.1 The
purpose of this Act is to provide a framework for
(a) the proper
management and control of fisheries; and
(b) the
conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat, including by preventing
pollution.
|
Section 35
|
Harmful alteration, etc., of fish habitat
35. (1) No person shall carry on any work
or undertaking that results in the harmful alteration, disruption or
destruction of fish habitat.
|
Serious harm to fish
35 (1) No person shall carry on any work,
undertaking or activity that results in serious harm to fish that are part of
a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, or to fish that support
such a fishery.
|
Harmful alteration, disruption or
destruction of fish habitat
35 (1) No person shall carry on any work,
undertaking or activity that results in the harmful alteration, disruption or
destruction of fish habitat.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment